admin

Potential Performance Indicator Suitability Thresholds

To assist with future monitoring and status reporting for the Klamath basin, ESSA researched potential suitability thresholds for candidate performance indicators and compiled available information into a document. These suitability thresholds are not included in the IFRMP itself nor have they been vetted by project participants, but at the time of writing the IFRMP these

Potential Performance Indicator Suitability Thresholds Read More »

IFRMP Prioritization Criteria and Resources

After careful consideration of alternatives, we adopted a multi-criteria scoring approach to prioritization that has undergone multiple rounds of peer-review by Sub-basin Working Group (SBWG) participants. The multi-criterion prioritization framework developed for Phase 3 of the IFRMP is based on six key questions to ask about any restoration project under consideration, which are linked to

IFRMP Prioritization Criteria and Resources Read More »

IFRMP Action-Stressor Definitions and Linkages Data Dictionary

The IFRMP Action-Stressor Definitions and Linkages Data Dictionary is the architecture of the IFRMP database and establishes how restoration actions and stressors are hierarchically linked together. It uses a standardized classification system for restoration actions in order to consistently describe restoration projects across multiple rounds of prioritization. Within this classification system, watershed restoration actions directly

IFRMP Action-Stressor Definitions and Linkages Data Dictionary Read More »

Thank-you Phase 2 through 4 Participants!

The Integrated Fisheries Restoration and Monitoring Plan (IFRMP) prioritization results are the product of the coordinated efforts of a vast team committed to improving fishery restoration practices in the Klamath Basin. Additional input from interested participants during finalization of the Plan in Phase 5 will help make this Plan better. To date, the data, advice

Thank-you Phase 2 through 4 Participants! Read More »

Prioritization Criteria: Quick Reference Guide

After careful consideration of alternatives, we adopted a multi-criteria scoring approach to prioritization that has undergone multiple rounds of peer-review by Sub-basin Working Group (SBWG) participants. The multi-criterion prioritization framework developed for Phase 3 of the IFRMP is based on six key questions to ask about any restoration project under consideration, which are linked to

Prioritization Criteria: Quick Reference Guide Read More »

Process-Based Restoration Expressed Through Watershed Functional Process (Biophysical) Tiers

The state of the science in river restoration ecology increasingly calls for more holistic approaches to restoration at the basin scale. Contemporary approaches seek to address multiple root causes of ecosystem degradation by emphasizing restoration of landscape-scale ecological processes and functions rather than the traditional focus on the resulting symptoms for individual sites and species.

Process-Based Restoration Expressed Through Watershed Functional Process (Biophysical) Tiers Read More »